Sookie -
It's not over yet, but if this isn't your month, maybe it would be a good idea to take a break from thinking about it all whilst you're on holiday, and then see what happens when you get back? WHen do you leave Colombia and return to Oz?
to Trudy too.
Well, I went to the doctor's this morning and I shall tell you about it simply because it's always reassuring to hear what other people's doctors say!
Sooooo... I said I was back because I'd been told to come back after 3 months. I said most cycles were 30-32 days with an 11-day luteal phase, but they'd gone a bit odd after the chem pg for 3 months (as the doc has said they might), and then I had a weird 17-day cycle this month. Was there a problem or reason why I wasn't getting pg?
The doc said that although some women have cycles like clockwork, most aren't so lucky and some are very unlucky. It's quite common to have 'regular-ish' cycles, i.e. you can predict which week AF will turn up, if not which day. He said that a 17-day cycle isn't normal - but that one 17-day cycle is not abnormal, and if your cycles aren't like clockwork to begin with, you're more likely to have the odd cycle here and there. It's not indicative of a problem.
He also said that my blood tests were all excellent, and that the progesterone test was 'optimal' (54.2, I think, if that means anything to anyone), so he was satisfied there was no hormone problem. My weight has fluctuated within a very small (2kg) range for the 8 years I've been with him, which is also great and further suggests no medical problem such as PCOS or thyroid. BMI should be within 20-25, and it's always around 21.5-22, so again, absolutely fine. Blood pressure and heart rate are both optimal too, so no underlying health problems.
Basically, his conclusion was that it's just bad luck. 80% of couples conceive within a year, and a further 10% within a second year, with no assistance. Within the first year, it's not frontloaded -i.e. 20% of couples will conceive months 1-3, 20% 3-6, 20% 6-9 and 20% 9-12, with a futher 10% after 12. These are the couples with no known problems, or pre-existing, managed problems (eg if you're being treated for PCOS that was known about before TTC). That's just the way it is.
The upshot was that there's not much that the doctor can do at the moment because there's no obvious problem - he fully expects me to get pg within the next three months (well, rates it as 90% likely, anyway!). His view was that if you're ovulating, and having regular-ish periods, and the blood tests come back fine, then it's just a waiting game, which is boring, but tough. As he says, in this situation, the longer you've been waiting, the less time left to wait... He said that the next investigative steps are intrusive (laparoscopy, etc) and not particularly comfortable, or else involve drugs 'to see what happens' - but given that there is no obvious problem, he didn't think throwing drugs at me was the solution (and I totally agree), and he also felt that I might be happier to wait a little longer before going for intrusive examinations (too bloody right...). So the outcome was that I should go back in 3 months if not pg, and sooner if I am
In some ways you may all think this isn't particularly helpful, but actually I'm quite happy to be 'doing nothing', as it's managed nothing... I feel quite reassured.
Hopefully it'll reassure some of the others on here too - I'm thinking particularly of Trudy
, whom I think is in a similar situation to me, but a couple of months further down the line?
btw, the doc did say that if I had been having very long irregular cycles, or not ovulating, he would be pushing for medical intervention much earlier, so it's definitely worth getting the blood tests done. HTH.