babyem
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2011
- Messages
- 9,974
- Reaction score
- 0
I do agree with Carnat to a point.
I agree re resources and cost. Why should women have elective c-sections with none of the previously medical and/or psychological reasons at a big cost, which over time may mean cuts to other areas of maternal care? I think if you feel so strongly about having a c-section without medical/psychological grounds to base it on then you should be advised to go private.
It is a major abdomimal surgery. If it were any other surgery ie a gastric band, and someone went straight for that option over all the other natural options they would be refused. Why? Because its too expensive an option as a plan A and it is too risky without trying alternative options. Now I know a vaginal child birth carries risks, but they are less so than c-sections.
I wont go on but thats my two pence worth
I agree re resources and cost. Why should women have elective c-sections with none of the previously medical and/or psychological reasons at a big cost, which over time may mean cuts to other areas of maternal care? I think if you feel so strongly about having a c-section without medical/psychological grounds to base it on then you should be advised to go private.
It is a major abdomimal surgery. If it were any other surgery ie a gastric band, and someone went straight for that option over all the other natural options they would be refused. Why? Because its too expensive an option as a plan A and it is too risky without trying alternative options. Now I know a vaginal child birth carries risks, but they are less so than c-sections.
I wont go on but thats my two pence worth