My SIL specified no skin on skin. I was too scared to ask why incase im being offensive and thinking why wouldnt you. Even if you chose not to bf..
xxxx
My SIL specified no skin on skin. I was too scared to ask why incase im being offensive and thinking why wouldnt you. Even if you chose not to bf..
xxxx
Oh I wonder why that was? They say that helps regulate temperature, breathing and everything don't they... im curious to know why you wouldn't want that either xxx
I can see where she's coming from...My SIL specified no skin on skin. I was too scared to ask why incase im being offensive and thinking why wouldnt you. Even if you chose not to bf..
xxxx
Oh I wonder why that was? They say that helps regulate temperature, breathing and everything don't they... im curious to know why you wouldn't want that either xxx
It was weird I thought I misheard her but actually she was pregnant at the time and we were discussing labour plans and she says mine is pretty much the same as the first just no skin to skin.. And I said NO skin to skin and she said yeah I didnt do it with the first. I chose not to have them born onto me to she says... But even I was thinking well why not do it with the first but you know what its like dont wanna pry too much on peoples particular choices incase they feel judged or whatever...
I dunno why you wouldnt? Jackson was like balanced on me and after 5 mins i freaked out and david took him until I moved and felt stable then took him back.
Edit: just remembered she also said, she wanted them cleand brought over wrapped so dunno if thats maybe how she was born shes weird traditional like that orr she didnt want gross stuff on her? I dunno I dont get it. Your in labour, you dont care bout grossness either? Who knows.?. And her aunt is a MW and was in her labour.???
xxxx
I can see where she's coming from...My SIL specified no skin on skin. I was too scared to ask why incase im being offensive and thinking why wouldnt you. Even if you chose not to bf..
xxxx
Oh I wonder why that was? They say that helps regulate temperature, breathing and everything don't they... im curious to know why you wouldn't want that either xxx
It was weird I thought I misheard her but actually she was pregnant at the time and we were discussing labour plans and she says mine is pretty much the same as the first just no skin to skin.. And I said NO skin to skin and she said yeah I didnt do it with the first. I chose not to have them born onto me to she says... But even I was thinking well why not do it with the first but you know what its like dont wanna pry too much on peoples particular choices incase they feel judged or whatever...
I dunno why you wouldnt? Jackson was like balanced on me and after 5 mins i freaked out and david took him until I moved and felt stable then took him back.
Edit: just remembered she also said, she wanted them cleand brought over wrapped so dunno if thats maybe how she was born shes weird traditional like that orr she didnt want gross stuff on her? I dunno I dont get it. Your in labour, you dont care bout grossness either? Who knows.?. And her aunt is a MW and was in her labour.???
xxxx
With my first I thought I wanted skin to skin and no cleaning and things and its not like I'm grossed out by it. After my first was born they webt to give her to me and I just handed her straight to DH. I was so tired, I had been in so much pain I just wanted to sleep and rest and have a breather for a few minutes. After carrying her for 9 months my dh was pretty keen on getting in on the bonding too so it worked well for us. With my second I told them straight off to hand him straight to dh. For me it just gave me some time to breathe, be relieved it was all over and ogle them from afar where I could eat toast and drink tea and just sit for a minute. I have them back after about 20 mins and get them on the boob but until then I sort of just enjoy having my body back for a bit.