Dragonfly Fi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 4,339
- Reaction score
- 0
I think there is a huge difference between putting none invasive jewellery on a child (which is totally subjective) and putting HOLES IN A BABY for purely asthetic reasons. A baby couldnt care less if it has its ears pierced which to me suggests its far more about the parent than the child, so it is a carer putting an innocent baby with no way of helping itself, in pain for their own gains
i fell very strongly it should be banned.
i fell very strongly it should be banned.