I'm not opting for a c section because of the 35% of inductions end up in emergency c-section.Maybe I didnt make my point clear enough. What I mean is that if you are opting for an c section because 35% of inductions end in c section... yet want a vaginal birth why not take the chance that 65% of induction are vaginal births (what you want) and if you end up with a section your not that bothered anyway cause you thought about elective section?
I dont really get why you would want major surgery when the likelihood points to a normal vaginal birth.
I am not talking about costs to the hospital. A doctor wouldnt opt for you to have a less invasive procedure over surgery if it was more dangerous just because of the cost. They has to be other elements taken into consideration.
Anyway, thats just how im thinking. Obviously you have every right to go with c section if offered to you, i wouldnt personally.
x
I'm opting for a planned c-section, IF I go overdue, as I deem the risks involved with an induction incl. the emergency c-section are too high for my unborn son and myself.
Yes, there are people out there who have had wonderful inductions just as well as there are people who have had no complication c-sections.
We each look at the risk factors differently but I believe in my gut instinct and I can't ignore the fact that we have friends with a severely handicapped son and others who gave birth to angels - all of them were induced.
Excuse for what?but your risking having a c section on the off chance that you might need inducing and have those risks, you may just be fine and have a natural normal birth. If its what you want to do that's fine and your choice but the whole induction thing sounds like an excuse really (sorry to sound harsh) x
I don't expect others to understand my reasoning for wanting to avoid getting induced and that's fine, but just to be clear I do hope for a natural birth.
I'm hoping that I'll give birth naturally between week 38-40, but I want in my birth plan that if I should go over time then I want a c-section by 41+0 and not get induced because of the risks involved with getting induced.
Excuse for having a planned section is what i meant because you hadn't explained only if you went overdue, i thought you meant you wanted one no matter what on the off chance that you needed induction.
I just think you come off as sounding a bit mixed up because as ladies have explained there are a lot of risks with c section it sounds like your ignoring because of your friends bad experience.
We almost lost my sister in law after a planned section (breech baby) due to a bad reaction to the drugs and she had a fit, then the doctors wanted to know what drug she had reacted to so she had another fit She lost the first few days with her son because of her been asleep, she missed changing, dressing, feeding for the first time and even though he is 10 now she still wishes she had those moments.
I dont want to scare you but im saying you can't let one off's cloud your judgment. What im struggling to understand is - - if you are happy with a c section, and you have induction then there is a 65% chance you will have a vaginal bith which your happy with and a 35% chance of a c section which also your happy with, What risks are you most worried about with the induction?
Again i really dont want to sound nasty im trying to understand xx
Yes, I'm aware and we will book a maternity nurse and our cleaner has agreed to errands and other housework needed the weeks after my husbond goes back to work until I'm fully recovered.I know heaps of horror stories with c sections. I won't even have an epidural if I need to have a section. My friend's epidural was stuffed up and she leaked spinal fluid so her brain was just sitting on her spine. Another friend it was not working properly and she could feel the scalpel cut into her, not to mention the fact that they tear the skin the rest of the way. Its easier to stitch up. I know of someone else who had something cut that was not meant too be and she almost bled to death. I know more stories and each one wishes they could have done it naturally even with induction. I'd actually go as far to say 50% or more of people I know who have had one has a bad story.
C sections should be avoided for so many reasons be it human error or just plain bad luck. Just make sure you know all the risks before you sign on the dotted line. Plus remember you will be dependent on other people 4 at least 6 weeks afterwards.
No, I'm simply crossing my fingers that he wants to come out between week 38-40.I'm not opting for a c section because of the 35% of inductions end up in emergency c-section.Maybe I didnt make my point clear enough. What I mean is that if you are opting for an c section because 35% of inductions end in c section... yet want a vaginal birth why not take the chance that 65% of induction are vaginal births (what you want) and if you end up with a section your not that bothered anyway cause you thought about elective section?
I dont really get why you would want major surgery when the likelihood points to a normal vaginal birth.
I am not talking about costs to the hospital. A doctor wouldnt opt for you to have a less invasive procedure over surgery if it was more dangerous just because of the cost. They has to be other elements taken into consideration.
Anyway, thats just how im thinking. Obviously you have every right to go with c section if offered to you, i wouldnt personally.
x
I'm opting for a planned c-section, IF I go overdue, as I deem the risks involved with an induction incl. the emergency c-section are too high for my unborn son and myself.
Yes, there are people out there who have had wonderful inductions just as well as there are people who have had no complication c-sections.
We each look at the risk factors differently but I believe in my gut instinct and I can't ignore the fact that we have friends with a severely handicapped son and others who gave birth to angels - all of them were induced.
Surely if this were the case then this would never be an option for expectant mothers...
A woman on here had a section and ended up with an infection which ate away at her flesh so had to have the infection tissue removed with further surgery aswell as having to have a suction drain on the wound for 6 weeks.
Although I was fairly happy with my c-section, I have such alot of guilt regarding my LOs delivery. I was that dosed up on drugs that I couldn't hold LO as I was shaking so much, it was about an hour or so until I got too. Because I was so doped up when I tried BF I couldn't stay awake, so never got that first feed and our first cuddles only lasted a few mins or so as I was lay completely flat and couldn't hold her properly. I lost alot of blood so felt like crap, I had to have someone take me to the loo on a commode as the pain was awful.
I also got mastitis (which I'm not saying was due to the section) but it was so much harder to deal with because of my scar. Oh and there's the 6 week recovery time, where you can't lift/carry anything heavier than LO or walk very far- so no pushing your brand new baby around with pride, or nipping to the shops. And when OH went back to work I couldn't do a quick tidy up or anything, as no hoovering allowed or bending. No driving for weeks either so have to rely on others to ferry you about- which I hate. And then you have another 6 weeks (so 12 in total) until you are actually back to full strength.
It's major surgery, just like other non-pregnancy related surgeries, and I'm sure that you would try other methods to resolve a problem rather than go straight for surgery if it were anything else.
No, I'm simply crossing my fingers that he wants to come out between week 38-40.I'm not opting for a c section because of the 35% of inductions end up in emergency c-section.Maybe I didnt make my point clear enough. What I mean is that if you are opting for an c section because 35% of inductions end in c section... yet want a vaginal birth why not take the chance that 65% of induction are vaginal births (what you want) and if you end up with a section your not that bothered anyway cause you thought about elective section?
I dont really get why you would want major surgery when the likelihood points to a normal vaginal birth.
I am not talking about costs to the hospital. A doctor wouldnt opt for you to have a less invasive procedure over surgery if it was more dangerous just because of the cost. They has to be other elements taken into consideration.
Anyway, thats just how im thinking. Obviously you have every right to go with c section if offered to you, i wouldnt personally.
x
I'm opting for a planned c-section, IF I go overdue, as I deem the risks involved with an induction incl. the emergency c-section are too high for my unborn son and myself.
Yes, there are people out there who have had wonderful inductions just as well as there are people who have had no complication c-sections.
We each look at the risk factors differently but I believe in my gut instinct and I can't ignore the fact that we have friends with a severely handicapped son and others who gave birth to angels - all of them were induced.
Surely if this were the case then this would never be an option for expectant mothers...
A woman on here had a section and ended up with an infection which ate away at her flesh so had to have the infection tissue removed with further surgery aswell as having to have a suction drain on the wound for 6 weeks.
Although I was fairly happy with my c-section, I have such alot of guilt regarding my LOs delivery. I was that dosed up on drugs that I couldn't hold LO as I was shaking so much, it was about an hour or so until I got too. Because I was so doped up when I tried BF I couldn't stay awake, so never got that first feed and our first cuddles only lasted a few mins or so as I was lay completely flat and couldn't hold her properly. I lost alot of blood so felt like crap, I had to have someone take me to the loo on a commode as the pain was awful.
I also got mastitis (which I'm not saying was due to the section) but it was so much harder to deal with because of my scar. Oh and there's the 6 week recovery time, where you can't lift/carry anything heavier than LO or walk very far- so no pushing your brand new baby around with pride, or nipping to the shops. And when OH went back to work I couldn't do a quick tidy up or anything, as no hoovering allowed or bending. No driving for weeks either so have to rely on others to ferry you about- which I hate. And then you have another 6 weeks (so 12 in total) until you are actually back to full strength.
It's major surgery, just like other non-pregnancy related surgeries, and I'm sure that you would try other methods to resolve a problem rather than go straight for surgery if it were anything else.
Listen, I wasn't really asking for anybody's opinion or approval - I was asking whether anybody knew what rights one has when it comes to a c-section when being overdue.The reasons you have said for not wanting to be induced are pregnancy related tho... These things could happen overdue or not?!?
C-sections are MAJOR surgery and should only be used in extreme circumstances...
I'm sure if inductions were so dangerous the nhs would change there guidelines and they wouldn't do them the way they do.
4 of my friends, plus me have all had babies this year. So that's 5 pregnancies that were all induced.
Only 1 of these births ended up with medical assistance, and she had a foreceps delivery. She has health complications before, so this was not a surprise.
Personally I loved being induced, I was monitored at every point in my labour, on the medical side of the labour ward. With a senior midwife. There was 2 midwifes present due to having an induced labour.
I had an epidural and no intervention whatsoever.
I had my baby and was home with him 12 hours later. Breastfeeding and feeling great.
I think that c-section risks outweigh an induced delivery.