Im soooo stuck with this and need some sence knocking into me.
When i moved into my house after me and ex split i always said it was a temp thing, never wanted to be here long and said that once xmas was out the way then was my time to move. So iv asked my landlord if he had anything sutible and at the time he didnt so asked around for me and there was a house in the area that i wanted and its a lovely house, i really fell in love with it tbh even thought the rent is 75 more than my current rent. But it was worth it to be where i want to be and kate would be with all her friends.
But.. my landlord called me this morning and offered me a house in the next village along for the same as the rent im paying now and its bigger and in a nice area. I know the house and the area and its a lovely little cul de sac very quiet nice garden ect for the kids.
My problem is, i dont know what one to take, If i have my one off my landlord i can just move no referance or fafing around ect but i really really like the other house. It has down sides though like its on the main road but the garden is well fenced in so the kids can still play out. so not a huge problem. The other house is only 9 miles away from this one so its not a huge distance. Just being in town would be sooo much easyer than out and having to pick kates friends up and drop them off again.
Im just kind of stuck with whats sensible and what i want. My head say's cheeper house less fuss my heart says house that you love even though you would be 75 poorer each month.
I know im lucky to have the choice, and i feel a real bag for moaning about having to choose.I just want to make the right choice, im sick of moveing i want to find somewhere to stay to make a home off on my own with my kids. Moveing out of the house that me and the ex had was awfull not just for me but for the kids as well. I want them to be happy where we are to. Does any of that make any sence.
When i moved into my house after me and ex split i always said it was a temp thing, never wanted to be here long and said that once xmas was out the way then was my time to move. So iv asked my landlord if he had anything sutible and at the time he didnt so asked around for me and there was a house in the area that i wanted and its a lovely house, i really fell in love with it tbh even thought the rent is 75 more than my current rent. But it was worth it to be where i want to be and kate would be with all her friends.
But.. my landlord called me this morning and offered me a house in the next village along for the same as the rent im paying now and its bigger and in a nice area. I know the house and the area and its a lovely little cul de sac very quiet nice garden ect for the kids.
My problem is, i dont know what one to take, If i have my one off my landlord i can just move no referance or fafing around ect but i really really like the other house. It has down sides though like its on the main road but the garden is well fenced in so the kids can still play out. so not a huge problem. The other house is only 9 miles away from this one so its not a huge distance. Just being in town would be sooo much easyer than out and having to pick kates friends up and drop them off again.
Im just kind of stuck with whats sensible and what i want. My head say's cheeper house less fuss my heart says house that you love even though you would be 75 poorer each month.
I know im lucky to have the choice, and i feel a real bag for moaning about having to choose.I just want to make the right choice, im sick of moveing i want to find somewhere to stay to make a home off on my own with my kids. Moveing out of the house that me and the ex had was awfull not just for me but for the kids as well. I want them to be happy where we are to. Does any of that make any sence.