x-kirsty-x
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2006
- Messages
- 5,617
- Reaction score
- 0
My MIL is 40 and had her 5th baby 8 months ago. She's one of the most devoted mothers I know and is in perfect health. Thats why I said 50-60 is too old rather than 40
FoxyMummy said:having a child at the age of 40/50 is selfish..... if something was to happen to either or both partent the child is going to be 20 at the most! if my mum had me at 40/50 i wouldnt have thanked her!!
Im 18 and my patrents and grandparents are very happy for me and really excited too.
I never intended to hurt anyone
or
upset anyone by this post, it is only opinnions!!
Im not sayin at 40/50year old parent will not give the child all it needs as im sure every parent does the best for their child.
someone said that mother nature decides when you stop having children....... well i was 10/11 when i got my period so does that mean that it was ok for me to have a child at 10/11???
i work at a nursing home and i have a resident that is 47 and is very ill she has a 6 year old boy who had to be put in care as she was not able to lok after him and there is no other family to look after him!!
this is not right for a child at all!!
i just think its wrong people having kids at such old ages
Im sorry but its my opinnion and everyone is entitled to their opinion xx
i work at a nursing home and i have a resident that is 47 and is very ill she has a 6 year old boy who had to be put in care as she was not able to lok after him and there is no other family to look after him!!
this is not right for a child at all!!
so if the seriously ill patient was under 40 and their child had to be put in care this would be ok????
sorry but i am 40 and just had my 1st baby, that dosnt make me a bad mother or selfish, this baby was planned and we may even plan another!
yes everyone is entitled to their opinion but maybe this isnt the place eh!
tuck said:i work at a nursing home and i have a resident that is 47 and is very ill she has a 6 year old boy who had to be put in care as she was not able to lok after him and there is no other family to look after him!!
this is not right for a child at all!!
so if the seriously ill patient was under 40 and their child had to be put in care this would be ok????
sorry but i am 40 and just had my 1st baby, that dosnt make me a bad mother or selfish, this baby was planned and we may even plan another!
yes everyone is entitled to their opinion but maybe this isnt the place eh!
gingerpig said:FoxyMummy said:having a child at the age of 40/50 is selfish..... if something was to happen to either or both partent the child is going to be 20 at the most! if my mum had me at 40/50 i wouldnt have thanked her!!
Im 18 and my patrents and grandparents are very happy for me and really excited too.
I never intended to hurt anyone
or
upset anyone by this post, it is only opinnions!!
Im not sayin at 40/50year old parent will not give the child all it needs as im sure every parent does the best for their child.
someone said that mother nature decides when you stop having children....... well i was 10/11 when i got my period so does that mean that it was ok for me to have a child at 10/11???
i work at a nursing home and i have a resident that is 47 and is very ill she has a 6 year old boy who had to be put in care as she was not able to lok after him and there is no other family to look after him!!
this is not right for a child at all!!
i just think its wrong people having kids at such old ages
Im sorry but its my opinnion and everyone is entitled to their opinion xx
But people can get ill at any age and their children will need care. Also who knows when/if they are going to get ill - it's not something anyone has any control over, so how can you say it's selfish? By this logic, no one should have children as we may get ill one day.
tuck said:i work at a nursing home and i have a resident that is 47 and is very ill she has a 6 year old boy who had to be put in care as she was not able to lok after him and there is no other family to look after him!!
this is not right for a child at all!!
so if the seriously ill patient was under 40 and their child had to be put in care this would be ok????
sorry but i am 40 and just had my 1st baby, that dosnt make me a bad mother or selfish, this baby was planned and we may even plan another!
yes everyone is entitled to their opinion but maybe this isnt the place eh!
FoxyMummy said:ok what im trying to say is, the woman i work with does not have a partner and mother and father of her own!! and didnt at the time she got pregnant. it was just a one night stand and look what happened!!!
ok there is no law to say your not aloud to have sex when you passed 40 or what ever but their is a law to say you cant have sex untill you are 16, if everyone thinks its ok to get pregnant older why doesnt people opinnions count about people gettin pregnant younger????
Rubys mummy said:Budge said mother nature decides when we STOP having children not START so she wasnt suggesting you should have children at 10\11??!!!!
FoxyMummy said:ok what im trying to say is, the woman i work with does not have a partner and mother and father of her own!! and didnt at the time she got pregnant. it was just a one night stand and look what happened!!!
xx
FoxyMummy said:its just wrong in my eyes. if you dont like what im sayin sorry but i wont change it for anyone weather it does or doesnt upset anyone!!
Urchin said:FoxyMummy said:ok what im trying to say is, the woman i work with does not have a partner and mother and father of her own!! and didnt at the time she got pregnant. it was just a one night stand and look what happened!!!
So she should have had an abortion? just because it was a one night stand and she was 41? She obviously had no idea she was going to get ill... yet you think she is selfish?
ok there is no law to say your not aloud to have sex when you passed 40 or what ever but their is a law to say you cant have sex untill you are 16, if everyone thinks its ok to get pregnant older why doesnt people opinnions count about people gettin pregnant younger????
the minimum age for sex isnt there just to prevent pregnancy it prevents people having sex with children!
Urchin said:FoxyMummy said:its just wrong in my eyes. if you dont like what im sayin sorry but i wont change it for anyone weather it does or doesnt upset anyone!!
We all could have opinions that might upset people but this is a pregnancy forum where people of all ages are welcome, you are making out that people over a certain age shouldnt become parents, no one is asking you to change your opinon, but maybe this is not the place to post it?
FoxyMummy said:tuck said:i work at a nursing home and i have a resident that is 47 and is very ill she has a 6 year old boy who had to be put in care as she was not able to lok after him and there is no other family to look after him!!
this is not right for a child at all!!
so if the seriously ill patient was under 40 and their child had to be put in care this would be ok????
sorry but i am 40 and just had my 1st baby, that dosnt make me a bad mother or selfish, this baby was planned and we may even plan another!
yes everyone is entitled to their opinion but maybe this isnt the place eh!
so your tellin me if you didnt have ur parents around and something was to happen to you and your husband it wouldnt be selfish to leave a 20yearold or what evr age the child was to pay for ur funereal etc etc when the child could well be atuni or sopmething and have no money??????
its just wrong in my eyes. if you dont like what im sayin sorry but i wont change it for anyone weather it does or doesnt upset anyone!!
FoxyMummy said:for a start i didnt mention anything about an abortion so drop it!!!
SarahH said:FoxyMummy said:ok what im trying to say is, the woman i work with does not have a partner and mother and father of her own!! and didnt at the time she got pregnant. it was just a one night stand and look what happened!!!
xx
This woman you are talking about was probably over the moon to fall preg, yeh it was after a one night stand but if she had no parents and wasn't in a loving relationship... she would have had this little bundle of joy to share her love with.
She didnt know she was going to end up ill and her child go into care. If she did she prob wouldnt have had the child.
If we were all to think like that the human race would slowly disapear "just incase" we all fell ill to the point we couldnt look after our young.
Could I ask a Mod to lock this thread as I think it is just going to get out of hand and people get hurt with different opinions.
Also, I dont think you should be talking about one of the patients from your work as you probably had to sign a confidential form before you got the job.
Urchin said:FoxyMummy said:for a start i didnt mention anything about an abortion so drop it!!!
Erm, I only asked a question... she accidently got pregnant.... what should she have done then?
You are becoming very rude and defensive over this, like I said, no one is asking you to change your opinion, just maybe be a little more sensitive to OTHER peoples views.... you are basically saying some people on this forum are bad mothers, and you wonder why people don't like it?