fuffins1981
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2007
- Messages
- 2,238
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah... they do.
When I weighed at 33 weeks, I had lost 9lb in this pregnancy. My clothes even now still fit around my tummy like they did before I was pregnant. So, I think I have lost quite a lot of weight, while my bump has got mahussive lol
So, if baby is big, it's not what I ate. And GTT was negative.
I was my moms smallest baby at 8lb6, brother was 10lb3, sister was 9lb3 and lil bro was 8lb11.
My OH was 10lb 3 and his daughter was 9lb3. Though they say size of baby is determined more by maternal size...This baby has big genes lol
Both me and OH are 6ft2.5 too, so baby is probably long, which may have thrown them when predicting weight. It did with my son. He was 55cm, so they said he would be 10lb....but he was 8lb 1 (thank God!!)
When I weighed at 33 weeks, I had lost 9lb in this pregnancy. My clothes even now still fit around my tummy like they did before I was pregnant. So, I think I have lost quite a lot of weight, while my bump has got mahussive lol
So, if baby is big, it's not what I ate. And GTT was negative.
I was my moms smallest baby at 8lb6, brother was 10lb3, sister was 9lb3 and lil bro was 8lb11.
My OH was 10lb 3 and his daughter was 9lb3. Though they say size of baby is determined more by maternal size...This baby has big genes lol
Both me and OH are 6ft2.5 too, so baby is probably long, which may have thrown them when predicting weight. It did with my son. He was 55cm, so they said he would be 10lb....but he was 8lb 1 (thank God!!)