was your second labour quicker than your first?

elisesmum

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
421
Reaction score
0
So i had an induced first labour which only lasted 4 hour (tablet inserted) and wondered if im more likely to have a quicker second birth, i know every labour is different but just wondered if the old wifes tale has some truth in it xx
 
Last edited:
1st 30 odd hours
2nd 4 hours
3rd one hour hospital 3 mins before giving birth.

So with me yes they have got much faster each time, 4 hours was a fast labour for you first tho so maybe it won't change loads.
 
Yeah was for me too. Both times i had no signs my waters just popped and from waters going until baby in arms dd was 4 hours ds was 1 and half hours. So if I have a 3rd Im expecting less than an hour lol!
So if your like me don't wait around too long when you go into labour!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
 
My second labour was quicker than my first BUT my 3rd labour was longer than them both!!!

1st baby ~ 29hrs

2nd baby 12hrs 51mins

3rd baby 30hrs 28mins!
 
Definatly quicker for me second time.

Sent from my E15i using Tapatalk
 
1st- 3 & half hours
2nd - 1 & half hours

Now just waiting to see what happens on the third!!
 
1st was 13 hours
2nd was about 5 hours, tho I was asleep for most it, I was already 6cm by the time I got to the hosp, so that was just time I was awake lol
 
1st: 15 long hours (20 years ago!!)

2nd: 3 hours (yesterday)..

Both via water birth.

xx Rosie xx
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
473,575
Messages
4,654,640
Members
110,027
Latest member
joshatflare
Back
Top