http://nsnbc.me/2014/04/17/congressman-blasts-cdc-incestuous-relationships-vaccine-makers/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Poldermans
This man is responsible for the current use of beta blockers in heart surgery is in trouble because of scientific conduct.
http://zembla.vara.nl/seizoenen/2015/afleveringen/11-02-2015
Other studies are now claiming that it in fact may be harmful and if they can prove that they are right and this particular professor will be responsible for quite a big scandal in the medical industry.Also because he's suspected to have an incestuous relationship with a pharmaceutical company.
Which to me raises questions on top of my personal experience with not being taken seriously with concerns of side effects with myself whether there has been more fraud in the medical industry when it comes to scientific studies.
http://www.theguardian.com/science/...-breaches-uk-labs-potentially-deadly-diseases
And that too.
But here's the information on waned immunity which concerns me the most
http://news.sciencemag.org/health/2...ak-traced-fully-vaccinated-patient-first-time
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/lawrence-solomon/measles-vaccine_b_5376951.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/02/kathryn-muratore/the-measles-hysteria/
"So we can never be without a vaccine against it, a safer vaccine," says Dr. Poland. "Currently, upwards of 30 percent of the population can't get the current vaccine because they have any of a variety of medical conditions that would allow the live vaccine virus to propagate in their body and cause illness or death."
It's the idea that you might have no risk at all for a disease, and if we knew that, why bother to spend $300 to immunize against it?" Dr. Poland explains. "For instance, it costs about $400 for the human papillomavirus vaccine. There are people who respond after one dose. If we know that, and can improve the genetic drivers of that, we can eliminate the unnecessary cost of giving those people another dose. Another good example is hepatitis B. There are people genetically encoded to never respond to the vaccine. We can use that information to create a better, personalized vaccine."
http://www.mayo.edu/research/discoverys-edge/defense-vaccines
Dr. Poland is a highly respected pro-vaccine doctor.
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-measles-adults-20150212-story.html#page=1
http://www.theguardian.com/society/...asles-eradication-plans-have-stalled-says-who
http://www.whoopingcough.net/dr-j-biography.htm
Dr. Doug Jenkinson knows his facts about whooping cough as he studied this in his years of practice.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-their-vaccinations-too-for-lots-of-diseases/
And again it's these bloody adults.
http://www.businessinsider.com/a-to...accination-made-him-lose-his-mind-2015-2?IR=T
Enough to highlight the importance of adult immunization if we want to take infant/children's schedule seriously?
Personally I haven't come to a conclusion whether to vaccinate or not. But I am a firm believer that if you want to protect the little ones by vaccinating them you need to keep up to date with vaccines yourself. I do respect people who do. I however don't respect people who don't.
http://birthanarchy.com/pro-choice-movement-deployed-paternalism-vaccine-war/
For example my partner who seems to be very pro-vaccine and doesn't want to hear any of my concerns or what I perceive to be a conflicting advice between several countries and their schedule and how their schedules are layed out different. It's only been recent where he has opened up and accepted some fair points I have made. He then made the shocking revelation to me that he didn't even know what we are actually vaccinating for, being scared of dying from measles (while realistically the risks of dying from meningitis is higher than for example measles so to use measles as a fear tactic doesn't really convince me of running to the docs to get all three or four they think they're going to give at the same time).
He has called me a ****** on the subject several times and despite the facts being laid out that if he wants to protect his own child and himself and the rest of the herd he would need to go in. It's been 30+ years since he had whooping cough so he'd need a booster looking at the information available, he too would need a MMR booster and he would likely be in the group to have missed out on the MEN C meaning he would need to top up on that one too. His initial response was
I do not need to get them jabs because I am an adult and I can make that decision for myself!
He seriously said that which infuriates me, so I give him the evidence which is anything but anti-vaccine but more like from his side the absolute pro-vaccine people who are giving this advice, who are urging more adults to get their vaccines up to date and keep track. He then said, Ok I'll go and ask the doctor what vaccines our lb needs and which one I need. I said to him to go and get himself stocked up on 3 or 4 at the same time and if you are fine, you can take our child... But he hasn't made an effort since.
And you know actions speak louder than words. Well that's the classic example of knowing where someone's priority's lay.
I've done 21 one pages so far with collecting information like this and highlighting parts and raising questions where I have them and I'm going to have to make it a bit easier to over look and then I'm going to give it to him in the hope he'll stop calling me a ****** on the subject and is willing to look at the information together rather and make a decision what and where to vaccinate against what (before the start of nursery) than separate and have some sort of wannabe debate between two non-professionals who can't come up to a conclusion for the sake of their own child.
To be honest I'm on the side and I'm very much wanting to be on the side where I want to accept vaccines in my own proportion where I feel that is really necessary but will also find efficient enough to "take the risk of vaccinating" while on the other hand "I'm taking the risk not to vaccinate but then again I've done that for 18 months now" but it's really hard it is made out to seem there is only two sides either in favour or against and because I'm a skeptic I'm pushed in the anti-corner.
But both sides don't attract me 100% the most ridiculous things I have read from vaccine refusers/skeptics is that soon the vaccines will contain a chip you can't even see so basically everyone will be microchipped through vaccination and to top that allegation of JESUS told us about it back whenever he had done..
Now I'm not just a vaccine skeptic, I'm also very skeptical about religion and it's facts about it we claim we know today whilst factual history is something totally different. But anyway that literally made my jaw drop to the floor. Since I have unfollowed anything that spuws nonsense like that and despite it filters out a lot of information previously read which isn't necessarily untrue, I want to go over again and if it hasn't got any credible sources to government statistics their conclusions are based on I doubt the validity of the entire story. Although that's more on the website and article writers who are actively anti-vaccine people.
It's genuinely hard to be in the grey area because it's easy for people to mistake you for a total anti-vaxxer which I am certainly not. I don't believe it can cause autism and I don't support people who reject all modern medicine like anti-biotics and believe high doses of vitamins (upon own risk without a trained professional) or using this colloidal silver I keep seeing people recommend each other. I can't support that either and the last thing I want to do is experiment with this things without a trained professional I rather get me anti-biotics from the GP. But then I don't mindlessly use everything the doctor precribed me, there's a list of things I never picked up after being prescribed and there has been stuff I've picked up and then binned after reading through the patient leaflet.
