Delta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,022
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello all, I haven't been on the forum in a while, as I was rather emotional and frustrated with our TTC journey so far. I recognise a few names on here,
Just wanted to get some advice, we have been ttc for over 2 years, spent the last 18 months running tests with the GP and at 2 years she referred us. There are no problems whatsoever it appears, my dh's SA is fine, my results are good (FSH, Progesterone, ultrasound, prolactin and thyroid). My periods are fairly regular, and last year when I was still testing I was definitely ovulating.
Basically we, the GP and the fertility doc have no idea why we aren't conceiving.
SO we had our first appointment with the fertility doc (Dr Shenfield at UCH) last week, and I left feeling half relieved and half fobbed off.
Having read all the guidelines I had expected we would go straight for IVF (after some tests), given it is unexplained infertility and we have been trying for over 2 years.
But the fertility doc wants us to try IUI first (3 rounds) then we have the option of moving on to IVF.
On one hand I am relieved I don't have to go straight onto IVF with all the hormones and potential complications and side effects. But on the other hand why is she recommending IUI (with climbed) even though we have no ovulation problems or any other identifiable problems, and the guidelines state very clearly IUI should not be offered in these cases but to move straight on to IVF.
I am just a bit confused and not sure how I feel about all of this.
Has anyone been through this? What are your views on this? Thanks xx
Just wanted to get some advice, we have been ttc for over 2 years, spent the last 18 months running tests with the GP and at 2 years she referred us. There are no problems whatsoever it appears, my dh's SA is fine, my results are good (FSH, Progesterone, ultrasound, prolactin and thyroid). My periods are fairly regular, and last year when I was still testing I was definitely ovulating.
Basically we, the GP and the fertility doc have no idea why we aren't conceiving.
SO we had our first appointment with the fertility doc (Dr Shenfield at UCH) last week, and I left feeling half relieved and half fobbed off.
Having read all the guidelines I had expected we would go straight for IVF (after some tests), given it is unexplained infertility and we have been trying for over 2 years.
But the fertility doc wants us to try IUI first (3 rounds) then we have the option of moving on to IVF.
On one hand I am relieved I don't have to go straight onto IVF with all the hormones and potential complications and side effects. But on the other hand why is she recommending IUI (with climbed) even though we have no ovulation problems or any other identifiable problems, and the guidelines state very clearly IUI should not be offered in these cases but to move straight on to IVF.
I am just a bit confused and not sure how I feel about all of this.
Has anyone been through this? What are your views on this? Thanks xx