Missybee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2014
- Messages
- 209
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello,
I'm currently 35 weeks pregnant with dc/da twins and during my antenatal visit after my growth scan yesterday, my consultant booked me for an elective cesarean in 3 weeks.
Apparently, statistically there are more risks of low birth weight and stillbirth associated with carrying past 38 weeks with a twin pregnancy due to the placentas become inefficient and starting to calcify after that time.
However, there is contradicting information too which states that we're more likely to create more problems with our mistrust of mother nature. And that letting babies decide when they're ready provides the best outcome. That the risks associated with going past week 38 are results of insufficient studies. That more women have successfully delivered healthy twins when allowing them to go past 38 weeks if that's what their bodies were designed to do. Most twin pregnancies don't last till week 37 but each and every woman and pregnancy is different. The conflicting side also argues that if a woman is going over the average gestation for a twin pregnancy it is more likely down to the those particular babies adding the finishing touches to their brain and lung development rather than an anomaly occuring.
What do you all think? Would you follow a blanket protocol or would you trust your body?
At the end of the day, no one can force me into a c-section and I can refuse at any time even if a date is set. But I would not want to be making a mistake by putting myself and my babies at risk either way.
I'm currently 35 weeks pregnant with dc/da twins and during my antenatal visit after my growth scan yesterday, my consultant booked me for an elective cesarean in 3 weeks.
Apparently, statistically there are more risks of low birth weight and stillbirth associated with carrying past 38 weeks with a twin pregnancy due to the placentas become inefficient and starting to calcify after that time.
However, there is contradicting information too which states that we're more likely to create more problems with our mistrust of mother nature. And that letting babies decide when they're ready provides the best outcome. That the risks associated with going past week 38 are results of insufficient studies. That more women have successfully delivered healthy twins when allowing them to go past 38 weeks if that's what their bodies were designed to do. Most twin pregnancies don't last till week 37 but each and every woman and pregnancy is different. The conflicting side also argues that if a woman is going over the average gestation for a twin pregnancy it is more likely down to the those particular babies adding the finishing touches to their brain and lung development rather than an anomaly occuring.
What do you all think? Would you follow a blanket protocol or would you trust your body?
At the end of the day, no one can force me into a c-section and I can refuse at any time even if a date is set. But I would not want to be making a mistake by putting myself and my babies at risk either way.
Last edited: