Sunshine_1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Messages
- 556
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm slowly getting myself a bit worked up about this, which a bit silly so early on in my pregnancy but....
Years ago, before Scans, a pregnancy was dated by when the lady had her last period. 40 weeks later was due date.
When I had my daughter, the 'norm' was we were dated on when we had our last AF, and even if the Scan looked a little different, that was just the way it went, the only time we would be dated on a Scan alone is in the absence of any period for months previously or someone not having a clue when their last one was because they just couldn't remember.
Now it seems our date is set by a dating scan, sometimes moving our pregnancy dates by some 2-3 weeks compared to our AF dates.
This worries me....
When my OH was born, he was extremely late and there were all sorts of problems and complications because of this
When my daughter was born, I was induced 13 days after my due date, and I was told that it was good that she hadn't been left any longer (she'd shown some major signs of distress)
Now what panics me, is I'm not 100% sure how long after your due date they leave you now (in fact I'm told they start giving sweeps after a few days past etc) but I've been told it's 10 days? Now saying, because bubba is a little slow in growing they decide at scan to put you back 3 weeks, and then baby just doesn't want to come, and you go ten days over, your precious bundle could be anything up to a month over the date you have in your head in those first few weeks going by the date of your AF. Surely this cannot be good for bubba? In fact I worry that it's downright dangerous?
Perhaps it's me being old-fashioned, but I don't understand why they are relying on scans so much, especially when ladies like myself, and so many others on here know their dates of their last AF (and in my case even conception) so well. I know it CAN take a while for the egg to implant, but I know I was getting a few symptoms a week before my next period was due to start, we were well on our way by then, but a Scan could tell us all different.
Does anyone else see my point here and why I'm so worried? Does anyone know when they started this relying on the dating scan alone business?
Years ago, before Scans, a pregnancy was dated by when the lady had her last period. 40 weeks later was due date.
When I had my daughter, the 'norm' was we were dated on when we had our last AF, and even if the Scan looked a little different, that was just the way it went, the only time we would be dated on a Scan alone is in the absence of any period for months previously or someone not having a clue when their last one was because they just couldn't remember.
Now it seems our date is set by a dating scan, sometimes moving our pregnancy dates by some 2-3 weeks compared to our AF dates.
This worries me....
When my OH was born, he was extremely late and there were all sorts of problems and complications because of this
When my daughter was born, I was induced 13 days after my due date, and I was told that it was good that she hadn't been left any longer (she'd shown some major signs of distress)
Now what panics me, is I'm not 100% sure how long after your due date they leave you now (in fact I'm told they start giving sweeps after a few days past etc) but I've been told it's 10 days? Now saying, because bubba is a little slow in growing they decide at scan to put you back 3 weeks, and then baby just doesn't want to come, and you go ten days over, your precious bundle could be anything up to a month over the date you have in your head in those first few weeks going by the date of your AF. Surely this cannot be good for bubba? In fact I worry that it's downright dangerous?
Perhaps it's me being old-fashioned, but I don't understand why they are relying on scans so much, especially when ladies like myself, and so many others on here know their dates of their last AF (and in my case even conception) so well. I know it CAN take a while for the egg to implant, but I know I was getting a few symptoms a week before my next period was due to start, we were well on our way by then, but a Scan could tell us all different.
Does anyone else see my point here and why I'm so worried? Does anyone know when they started this relying on the dating scan alone business?