Are they referring to 6 weeks from last period date, or 6 weeks from conception date? That 2 week difference could confuse things.
When did you last do a digi test? Might be worth trying another if its been a couple of days xx
A digi would decrease as it detects level of hormones, but if you wanted to go down the tracking hormonal route (which is only thing you can do before HB is visable) then I would go with the bloods.
I got my first reading HCG of 2451 they told me at that point they had hoped to have seen sac etc which they hadnt seen, got more bloods 2 days later they dropped to 887 so for me it was confirmed one way or the other.
Bloods and if your doing a digi/testing faintness of lines theyr usually done 2 days appart. But I really wouldnt go solely on a pregnancy test for a hormonal reading.
xxxx
A digi would decrease as it detects level of hormones, but if you wanted to go down the tracking hormonal route (which is only thing you can do before HB is visable) then I would go with the bloods.
I got my first reading HCG of 2451 they told me at that point they had hoped to have seen sac etc which they hadnt seen, got more bloods 2 days later they dropped to 887 so for me it was confirmed one way or the other.
Bloods and if your doing a digi/testing faintness of lines theyr usually done 2 days appart. But I really wouldnt go solely on a pregnancy test for a hormonal reading.
xxxx
Do you remember how quickly you received blood results back?
Second reply "You wouldn't see an embryo at only 1mm Kitty. Kind Regards"
Sigh.
We've talked about it, and we're both expecting the worst. I think that will help cushion the blow somewhat, if that's even possible, next week.
I have no symptoms, no sickness, no CM. I wish I could just get a definitive answer as to whether 1mm is the correct measurement at 6 weeks or just under.