Urchin said:My OH is also an immigrant (South African) we wouldn't dream of letting his visa run out!
For a start by working when she was on a student vise, she was probably working cash in hand as she wouldn't have a national insurance number would she? She knew the student visa meant that she shouldn't work, yet she did. So she broke the rules on her visa, THEN she let it run out.
Sorry but that doesn't show respect for our rules.
Minime said:Urchin said:My OH is also an immigrant (South African) we wouldn't dream of letting his visa run out!
For a start by working when she was on a student vise, she was probably working cash in hand as she wouldn't have a national insurance number would she? She knew the student visa meant that she shouldn't work, yet she did. So she broke the rules on her visa, THEN she let it run out.
Sorry but that doesn't show respect for our rules.
I've known loads of British people on the dole working for cash in hand so not only are they breaking the law on declaring income and not paying tax they are defrauding the government. Should they also have treatment withheld?
Urchin said:My OH is also an immigrant (South African) we wouldn't dream of letting his visa run out!
For a start by working when she was on a student vise, she was probably working cash in hand as she wouldn't have a national insurance number would she? She knew the student visa meant that she shouldn't work, yet she did. So she broke the rules on her visa, THEN she let it run out.
Sorry but that doesn't show respect for our rules.
Squiglet said:If this woman can prove she's paid British taxes through working then I can't see why she should be allowed treatment, but if its been cash in hand as Urchin says then, no I don't believe she should have the right, because even though she's not been actively sponging off the government, she hasn't paid into the system to earn the right to treatment. Which is just as bad IMO.
but then you never get all the facts in these media cases to be able to effectively examine the situation and individual circumstances.
Urchin said:Squiglet said:If this woman can prove she's paid British taxes through working then I can't see why she should be allowed treatment, but if its been cash in hand as Urchin says then, no I don't believe she should have the right, because even though she's not been actively sponging off the government, she hasn't paid into the system to earn the right to treatment. Which is just as bad IMO.
but then you never get all the facts in these media cases to be able to effectively examine the situation and individual circumstances.
yes we are all just guessing.
I don't think it's possible to work and pay taxes if you aren't supposed to be working. You need a N.I. number for a start, my OH had to apply for one and go for and interview to get it so he could work legally. Also what tax code would she have? (students don't pay tax do they? even if they are working legally)