mary70 said:i voted yes, there are just certain people that shouldnt be allowed to breath the same air as law abiding people, just a few that spring to mind, the yobs that have just killed that man in the street, holly and jessicas killer, james bulger killers, beverly allot
natalie&jake said:On a bit of a tangent:
Ive just looked it up and it costs about £30k a year to keep somebody in prison WTF??? Thats less than it costs to run a household for a whole family. All they need is 4 walls, a loo and food. That is ridiculous Thats more than I earn. I dont see how that works out
This country is seriously fooked up
SOURCE
laetitia85 said:No waaaaay!!!
I'm very against the death penalty. You cannot teach someone not to kill by killing them yourself. i follow the commandment 'thou shall not kill' but i'd like to see tougher prison conditions for murderers.
Squiglet said:Although I don't think that 10 year olds should be murdered... although I do think they should have received much steeper punishments (the James Bulger killers that is)..
But there are many high profile murders and paedophiles, where there is no contest concerning their innocence... such as Ian Huntley and Fred West...(although Fred conducted his own death penalty). Where these people do deserve the death penalty for their crimes.
I think in cases where there is any reasonable doubt as to the total guilt of a person, then the death penalty should not be invoked. But in other cases where the guilt is proven 100% then there is justifiable reason.
What you need to think about is that "life" imprisonment in terms of the UK justice system usually means a max of 20 years. That means that Mr. Lovegoods killers, if they are 18/19 years old now... they will only be 38 when they get out and thats if they don't get time off for good behaviour.
Ian Huntley could be walking the streets when our kids are having their own children, yet still very capable of harming them. He was only 29 years old when he was convicted. If he gets out in 30 years it makes him 59 years old and most people are still working at that age so by no means "past it" so to speak. And to top it all off Mr. Huntley will be able to have all the protective services available to him... like Jon Venables and Robert Thompson... its not fair is it.... and Its a scary thought when you think about it.
lou said:laetitia85 said:No waaaaay!!!
I'm very against the death penalty. You cannot teach someone not to kill by killing them yourself. i follow the commandment 'thou shall not kill' but i'd like to see tougher prison conditions for murderers.
What about an 'eye for an eye' then?
jenna said:it might sound harsh to sentance a 'child' to death but if theyve killed some one how can you trust them ever again? I was a child once and i never even thought of killing some one never mind actually do it!
Becs said:lou said:laetitia85 said:No waaaaay!!!
I'm very against the death penalty. You cannot teach someone not to kill by killing them yourself. i follow the commandment 'thou shall not kill' but i'd like to see tougher prison conditions for murderers.
What about an 'eye for an eye' then?
Although that is in the bible the person who said it was the King of Babylon.
Jesus says, Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.
But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil; but whosoever shall smite thee on
thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
sadly I can It would go against his "human rights" to keep him locked up for murder when mr. jo blogs gets let out 20 years earlier for what is, in retrospect, the same offence...murder. Hindley and Brady were from another era... when the went to prison....it was punishment...not nowadays...beanie said:Can you honestly see Huntley being released though Squiglet, he has at least 40 years to serve but I think he will end up like Hindley and Brady. I think Rose West will also never see freedom again.
Fortunately they haven't been given the opportunity to reoffend... its a bit hard to kill someone when you are being watched by police 24/7... which is kinda a good thing in a way.beanie said:well the Bulger killers haven't re-offended.
Squiglet said:sadly I can It would go against his "human rights" to keep him locked up for murder when mr. jo blogs gets let out 20 years earlier for what is, in retrospect, the same offence...murder. Hindley and Brady were from another era... when the went to prison....it was punishment...not nowadays...beanie said:Can you honestly see Huntley being released though Squiglet, he has at least 40 years to serve but I think he will end up like Hindley and Brady. I think Rose West will also never see freedom again.
And until the government buck up their ideas and actually start making prison a punishment, life meaning life and deterrent again...I can't see a way forward. In a perfect world they'd be no need for the death penalty.
Fortunately they haven't been given the opportunity to reoffend... its a bit hard to kill someone when you are being watched by police 24/7... which is kinda a good thing in a way.beanie said:well the Bulger killers haven't re-offended.
we live in hope Beanie...and if there is any justice in this world (I'm talking Karmic justice though not HMP justice ) the end of his life will be as scary and painful as the end of the lives of his victims...beanie said:First of all with all the damage he has done to his liver with his countless overdose attempts I can't see him seeing 70