• Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

do u agree or disagree?

maldives

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
1,064
Reaction score
0
With having the second child immediately after ur first?
Well I know It's a bit early for me as i haven't passed the 6 weeks period yet. but i think maybe after 4 months i will start trying again? i would like to have 3 or 4 children and my thought is to have them after each other then to enjoy our life all together. is it easy to have a second child while my baby is few months old?
i know some of u have so plz let me know how it went as i would really want to try for the second one soon but not sure how will i cope being preggo with a baby and then having a toddler and a baby?
 
TBH i couldn't imagine having another baby or being pregnant any time soon. Hats off to you ladies that do but i really don't think i'd cope. I personally think a 4 yr break is the best time.. when LO goes to school so you can spend quality time with baby. xx
 
:talkhand: NO THANKS!

I take my hat off to the ladies who do it but I don't think I could!
 
No not at all, so I disagree. But that's just my opinion, if you feel you could cope then go for it :D
 
i sort of agree. i'm soooo clucky. i loved being pregnant. and i don't wanna go back to work :talkhand:

but i'd really worry about coping with 2 (or more) really little ones. and i'd know for sure that that really would be a complete end to 'me' time. i'm not quite ready for that yet.
 
I couldnt do it. BUT like everyone else has said its your life and your choice. But you'd spend twice as long feeding, twice as long nappy changing, twice as long bathing.
 
i think its a lovely idea infact we were going to start trying soon but because thomas op is now going to be in feb instead of the end of the year we thought it would be unfair on him to have his mum heavily pregnant so i wouldnt be able to stay with him and the hossie is an hours drive away and we dont drive so it would be very hard.
now we are going to try in jan for our second :)
if you want to do it then go for it sure it will be hard for a while but like everything you will soon get into a routine
xx
 
I always thought i would have 2 close together in age...

But when i got pregnant at 19.. that kind of went out of the window...

Im 20 now... would be too young to have 2 babies by the time im 21 IMO
 
Well by the time this baby gets here Lucy will be about three and a half and I'm thankful that she won't be in nappies but she's also going through a phase where she's rebelling against everything we want her to do.

I don't think there's a right or a wrong, just what suits your situation. If we have a third child I would want to be pregnant within 18 months and wouldn't want to leave it so long but having a closer gap, not sure its for me.

If it suits you to do it, and you feel ready for pregnancy again - then I say go for it. Only you know what's right for you and there are pros and cons either way.
 
I'd say it would be hard work if you have a newborn and a toddler. Consider also you'll be PG when your LO is still very small, learning to crawl, not sleeping as much etc so how will you feel during pregnancy chasing round after your LO and not being able to rest etc when you need to. Remember how you felt in your pregnancy, especially first tri which is exhusting in itself. Then the later months when big and about to drop.

Also it puts more strain on your body having children close together and not having a rest time (iirc they say a year isa good time to allow your body to bounce back fully from pregnancy, labour and feeding etc). You have been drained of nutrients and goodness knows what else by your baby during pregnancy and will continue to provide everything for your baby for as long as you breast feed. Chances are you may not conceive when still breastfeeding as often women don't have periods or ovulate till they stop breastfeeding. Your body needs to be allowed to recover and get back into shape to be in the best condition possible for trying to concieve and carry a second baby.

I've cared for 4 children in one family and they are about 2 years apart in age on average. That was close enough IMHO. A good break between and the mother gave her body time to recover from one pregnancy before trying again for the next baby. Each child was old enough by the time the next came along and their mother had time to each of the new arrivals before the next came along.

Also remember that how your baby is, isn't how the next will be. Pregnancy wise or once born. You may have an easier pregnancy, maybe a tougher one. Maybe the next baby will scream the place down from colic and exhust you. Consider how you will cope if you have a demanding baby and also a toddler running round. Do you think your toddler would be left out? Not have as much time spent with you as they might need because you are with a new baby a lot.

There are pros and cons to having babies close together. I personally don't think I'd go for them so close simply for my own body and also as I want to enjoy my son as much as possible before having another. They are only small for such a short time and I'd rather be able to zip around and spend time with him for a year before thinking about the next. 18 months, 2 years is a good gap as children will be close enough in age but far enough apart to allow each child their own time before the next arrives.

End of the day its what you feel able to do and what you want to do and what you feel is best for your child and future children. See how you are coping in a few months and then consider things again. You may feel very differently then from now. If you want 3 or 4 so close togther then good luck to you. Its bloody hard work with four kids 2 years apart, I know that.
 
OH and I have already decided that were going to TTC after Xmas so Evie will be 11 months by then. Ideally I'd like 18 months to 2 years between them so after Xmas seems like a good time to start.

I think it's personal choice...what works for one family wouldn't for another. Good luck with whatever you decide to do :hug: :hug: :hug: :hug: :hug:
 
I always said i'd wait 4 years, when Angel was at school. But now i'd like a smaller age gap. Angel is so good, i know the next may not be, but she's given me reason to think about them growing up together. Me and my sisters have close age gaps and always played together. There's 14 months between my sisters youngest two, and she does a fantastic job.
 
weve also said that were would like to try at xmas time , leland will be 11 months , but it took 2 years to concieve him so who knows ! if i fell straight away and guessing ill have about a 7 month pregnancy it would mean a perfect age gap and id really like a baby in the 2nd half of year ( first half is getting expensive lol ) but it prob wont work out that way ! i know i wont stress so much about ttc time because ill always hvae my lil boy ( someone remind me i said that lol )
 
Not bothered about what other people do, but for me, one pregnancy is quite enough for now thank you!! Having two close together would kill me, I'm not a brave soldier
 
I remember being soooo shattered in the 1st tri, I think that will be the hardest part to deal with. As you can tell by my sig, were going for about a 2year gap, it was going to be 18months, but I want to be working for long enough at wherever I decide to work so I can claim SMP again.

I take my hat off to the ladys that do it... I couldnt and, even then, I dont know how i'll manage when Corey is 15months and I fall pregnant. Because I had a cesarian my MW told me to wait atleast a year before having another one.

If thats what you want tho girl, then go for it :D
 
when i had my first i knew i want my next close together. there are 17 months between them. i'm not gonna deny it - i thought it was gonna be like having 1 over again but i was wrong - it was bloody hard work, but well worth it. after the 2nd t there's a 3 1/2 yr gap to the next and in some ways it was easier but in others not. i've now got 4 and theres 15 months between 3 and 4 and i love it. its still as much work as i remember but its lovely
 
Absolutely personal choice but no way was it for me :talkhand:

I was broody quite soon after birth but it passed. Your body takes time to settle down and it was important for me to respect that.
 
There is 5 years between Jamie and Charlie and I think it is a nice age gap in regards to Jamie being older means we can explain more to him about the baby, he can be more involved and if I am honest cos he is at school all day it makes looking after Charlie that bit easier. However........I must admit that I do regret leaving such a big gap as I know how much Jamie would have appreciated having a sibling closer in age to play with etc, cos even though he loves Charlie to bits he is limited on what he can do with him.

So, I think there are pros and cons on both sides and ultimately comes down to personal preference :D
 
if you had asked me at the same stage as you i would have love two really close together. It would be LOADS of work, but the idea of the pair of them being able to grow up together I found lovely.

However due to health issues, we decided it was best to wait.
 
Sherlock said:
I'd say it would be hard work if you have a newborn and a toddler. Consider also you'll be PG when your LO is still very small, learning to crawl, not sleeping as much etc so how will you feel during pregnancy chasing round after your LO and not being able to rest etc when you need to. Remember how you felt in your pregnancy, especially first tri which is exhusting in itself. Then the later months when big and about to drop.

Also it puts more strain on your body having children close together and not having a rest time (iirc they say a year isa good time to allow your body to bounce back fully from pregnancy, labour and feeding etc). You have been drained of nutrients and goodness knows what else by your baby during pregnancy and will continue to provide everything for your baby for as long as you breast feed. Chances are you may not conceive when still breastfeeding as often women don't have periods or ovulate till they stop breastfeeding. Your body needs to be allowed to recover and get back into shape to be in the best condition possible for trying to concieve and carry a second baby.

I've cared for 4 children in one family and they are about 2 years apart in age on average. That was close enough IMHO. A good break between and the mother gave her body time to recover from one pregnancy before trying again for the next baby. Each child was old enough by the time the next came along and their mother had time to each of the new arrivals before the next came along.

Also remember that how your baby is, isn't how the next will be. Pregnancy wise or once born. You may have an easier pregnancy, maybe a tougher one. Maybe the next baby will scream the place down from colic and exhust you. Consider how you will cope if you have a demanding baby and also a toddler running round. Do you think your toddler would be left out? Not have as much time spent with you as they might need because you are with a new baby a lot.

There are pros and cons to having babies close together. I personally don't think I'd go for them so close simply for my own body and also as I want to enjoy my son as much as possible before having another. They are only small for such a short time and I'd rather be able to zip around and spend time with him for a year before thinking about the next. 18 months, 2 years is a good gap as children will be close enough in age but far enough apart to allow each child their own time before the next arrives.

End of the day its what you feel able to do and what you want to do and what you feel is best for your child and future children. See how you are coping in a few months and then consider things again. You may feel very differently then from now. If you want 3 or 4 so close togther then good luck to you. Its bloody hard work with four kids 2 years apart, I know that.

You changed your mind about trying at 6 months then? I don't blame you!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,590
Messages
4,654,706
Members
110,069
Latest member
Newsteps
Back
Top