Yeah I didn't really think of it like that, it would be a bit confusing for poor Stanley.
I just read this message on another board and thought it was interesting, I don't know how accurate it is but if its true then it's very reassuring for those who have babies that don't eat much veg
There is a biological reason that children stereotypically do not like
vegetables. Their stomach is very small, their gut is very short, and
their liver can't process all the natural toxins contained in
vegetables yet. Let's talk about each in turn. Small stomach --
vegetables are filling and calorically- poor. The baby's rapidly
growing brain and body needs calories! If s/he fills up on broccoli,
there's no room for other, more caloric foods. Short gut -- it takes a
lot of gut to pull nutrients out of vegetables. Babies just don't have
it yet, which is why very often the veg comes out the other end
practically intact. Think about the gut of a carnivore, like a dog.
Those types of animals just can't process vegetables. Cows, with their
super-specialized gut, are perfectly adapted to get maximum nutrition
out of grass and other greens. Liver -- this gets toxins out of the
body. Organic or not, vegetables are filled with naturally-occurring
toxins which are hard for the baby's little system to process.
There is probably a biological reason related to all of the above as to
why our taste buds change as we age. As kids, we may have hated a food
(for me it was asparagus), but as adults, when we try it again, we like
it. Now is the time for those types of nutrients in higher quantity.
That is food for thought