I know there is a fine line here, I guess between controlling the media but still having freedom of speech. I feel like the media sometimes reports things that aren't needed.
As an example of the type of stories I mean: The policeman who killed himself last week, now the headlines are all about some sort of sordid double life he led. Ok he may well of been a loverat but what about his family? Trying to deal with not only his death but all these revelations too. What can it possibly achieve? It's not in the publics interest to know these kind of things.
There are many more examples too but you get my point I hope.
I know I am also at fault, I go onto websites and read this crap too but do we need to start putting some control over what the media report on?
As an example of the type of stories I mean: The policeman who killed himself last week, now the headlines are all about some sort of sordid double life he led. Ok he may well of been a loverat but what about his family? Trying to deal with not only his death but all these revelations too. What can it possibly achieve? It's not in the publics interest to know these kind of things.
There are many more examples too but you get my point I hope.
I know I am also at fault, I go onto websites and read this crap too but do we need to start putting some control over what the media report on?