SarahH said:If anyone should be sacked it should be the producer that decided to air it as the part of the show in question was prerecorded.
beanie said:I don't understand what the girl has to do with this - other then she was the victimin this?? She was obviously approached by the papers for her side, can she not have her say?
Flame said:His granddaughter like i say knows exactly what she is doing, and i think someone has already said it, but i wouldnt be suprised if she was in on it all.
beanie said:Flame said:His granddaughter like i say knows exactly what she is doing, and i think someone has already said it, but i wouldnt be suprised if she was in on it all.
right not only is she cashing in on her grandad being upset, she is also now in on it. Perhaps her and Russell plotted this during a post coital cigarette, deciding that he and Jonathon Ross would ridicule her on radio (she has obviously arranged it so he would appear on the Russell Brand show), and leave messages on his answerphone. She obviously bribed the producer to continue to broadcast it despite not having written consent from Andrew Sachs, and hired Max Clifford to help her out. All this for an interview in the Sun
I find it really sad that instead of being upset at a couple of grown men making abusive phonecalls to an elderly man, members of the public are excusing their behaviour and are instead focusing on the grand daughter (who is a victim in this) and blaming it on her. She obviously asked for it then. The comments on the sun website and her bebo account are shocking and show a very narrow minded view. I really do think that if she was a librarian or something she would not have had half of the crap she has.
SarahH said:Why is everyone still up in arms on this? The guy Sachs was on TV saying he had received "lovely, very lovely letters and phone calls" from both Russell Brand and Jonathon Ross and he has accepted there apologise... if he is man enough to accept their apologise why is half the country not.... where to be perfectly frank it has bugger all to do with us!
beanie said:if someone did it to me "a disappointment in bed" would be the mildest insult i could come up with. i would relish tell a national paper that his willy was a funny shape, smelled and the whole thing was over in 30 seconds. ad that he insisted on me calling him mother throughout whilst he would only address me as Bernard.
i hope she does get something positive out of it.
SarahH said:Why is everyone still up in arms on this? The guy Sachs was on TV saying he had received "lovely, very lovely letters and phone calls" from both Russell Brand and Jonathon Ross and he has accepted there apologise... if he is man enough to accept their apologise why is half the country not.... where to be perfectly frank it has bugger all to do with us!
beanie said:SarahH said:Why is everyone still up in arms on this? The guy Sachs was on TV saying he had received "lovely, very lovely letters and phone calls" from both Russell Brand and Jonathon Ross and he has accepted there apologise... if he is man enough to accept their apologise why is half the country not.... where to be perfectly frank it has bugger all to do with us!
They broadcast it on radio where it was heard by the public, and they are paid by the bbc who fund this through the tv licence so it has a lot to do with the public.
They didnt broadcast it..... the BBC producers did!! As it was all pre-recorded and Sachs has accepted the apologise, if the producers hadnt broadcast it the public would have been non the wiser!