Doob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi everybody. So I had my scan early scan today that I decided to book after a few weeks of over-worrying. Saw the heartbeat and baby was exactly as it should be so very relieved on that front.
However, when she measured bump she said it was measuring 6w6d based on her averages of 8.9mm and 9.1mm when she checked it but then said it might not be completely accurate at the moment. Now I didn't think much about this at the time, I was looking at the monitor instead. The thing is 6w6d doesn't seem possible to me. I got a +opk on the sat at cd14 and I tested again on the tues cd17 and got nothing. We also bd on the previous thurs cd12 and the sunday cd 15 so it seems a little odd that things would have met 5 days later on the following thursday cd19?! It would also mean I'd only have had 8 days before af was due for it to then go down on its journey to implant and then implant the day before af was due? and I'm always 28days nearly to the hour so I know my cycles don't fit with this idea of 6w6d
Anyway I doubled checked with them later and they said it would have been more accurate days if it had been an internal scan but as the heartbeat could be seen that wasn't necessary. I know everything is ok so far at least but I am a little miffed that for £100 they could have done the internal too to make my dates as accurate as possible? Or am I just being ultra picky?
BUT! at least my pics made me smile
However, when she measured bump she said it was measuring 6w6d based on her averages of 8.9mm and 9.1mm when she checked it but then said it might not be completely accurate at the moment. Now I didn't think much about this at the time, I was looking at the monitor instead. The thing is 6w6d doesn't seem possible to me. I got a +opk on the sat at cd14 and I tested again on the tues cd17 and got nothing. We also bd on the previous thurs cd12 and the sunday cd 15 so it seems a little odd that things would have met 5 days later on the following thursday cd19?! It would also mean I'd only have had 8 days before af was due for it to then go down on its journey to implant and then implant the day before af was due? and I'm always 28days nearly to the hour so I know my cycles don't fit with this idea of 6w6d
Anyway I doubled checked with them later and they said it would have been more accurate days if it had been an internal scan but as the heartbeat could be seen that wasn't necessary. I know everything is ok so far at least but I am a little miffed that for £100 they could have done the internal too to make my dates as accurate as possible? Or am I just being ultra picky?
BUT! at least my pics made me smile