Was i right to Override FF?

[kristenann]

It had me at day 17 ovulation, i only dont believe that correct because of 2 strong opks & usual temps pre O are 97.90 and after O as you see in 98.40 zone.. thing is i am due af and can kinda tell.. it puts me at only 11 luteral phase..i usually have 12-15 days :/

Sent from my XT1580 using Tapatalk

 

[KatD]

My opinion is that you were right to override FF

When estimating O it is important to look at temps as a whole (not individual) to see a pattern. There is a clear thermal shift and also, based on your OPKs I would not put O at CD17. You also had a 'dry' day after CD19 which is typical CM pattern for the day after O.

 

[Sunflower1]

In my experience FF is always wrong about ovulation. I would ditch it. Ovia is always accurate for me.

 

[alwayscoffee]

It looks like you ovulated on the 9th based on your positives and thermal shift. It's weird how you got 2 positives, a negative and then another positive though.

 

[kristenann]

Hi i agree cycle was weird. Cm wise it would have been likely to have been day 17 .. think was a wack (glad out of way) cycle

Sent from my XT1580 using Tapatalk

 

[kanga86]

I would say you ovulated on cd 17 based on temps, you show the classic dip before rise in temps for ovulation. Plus post ov temps don't need to be higher than the cross hairs just need to have 3 temp that have increased indicates ovulation. I don't get the extra 2 positive opks but they do say not to test after you get a positive xx

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk