valleygirl24
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2008
- Messages
- 493
- Reaction score
- 0
Went for the growth scan on monday, baby was measuring between 33-34 weeks (I was 30+2) so they are concerned about the growth. The abdominal circumference measurement they took put baby in the 90th percentile so I have to go back for tests.
Got a glucose tolerance test next wednesday and another scan on new years eve. The sonographer struggled to get a correct measurement of the babys head as it was deep in my pelvis so the 1 measurement was over estimated but that along with the others put the babys weight at 4lb 7oz, she said its probably over 4lb but not quite 4lb 7oz.
When she took all measurements she redone them as the 1st head one was WAY out, Ian said hes glad it was as it came up as 38 weeks!!!
The mesurements on my report are
BPD=91mm but inaccurate as fetal head is low in maternal pelvis
HC=311mm
AC=278mm
FL=60mm 90th centile
normal liquor volume
cephalic presentation
compared to my 20 week scan the HC is 119mm bigger, and FL is 26mm bigger
I also managed to get this photo of the babys face
Got a glucose tolerance test next wednesday and another scan on new years eve. The sonographer struggled to get a correct measurement of the babys head as it was deep in my pelvis so the 1 measurement was over estimated but that along with the others put the babys weight at 4lb 7oz, she said its probably over 4lb but not quite 4lb 7oz.
When she took all measurements she redone them as the 1st head one was WAY out, Ian said hes glad it was as it came up as 38 weeks!!!
The mesurements on my report are
BPD=91mm but inaccurate as fetal head is low in maternal pelvis
HC=311mm
AC=278mm
FL=60mm 90th centile
normal liquor volume
cephalic presentation
compared to my 20 week scan the HC is 119mm bigger, and FL is 26mm bigger
I also managed to get this photo of the babys face