I'm stuck between 3 different points of view - I'm all for the ethics, but from a practical point of view, it sucks
As a parent of a 'disabled' child, I want him to have the same opportunities as everybody else. I'd like to think that potential employers will see past his problems, but that's not going to happen. He'll be able to work for me so he can have a job if necessary, but I want him to be able to explore his dreams.
As an internet consultant, a large percentage of my income is because of the DDA - accessibility / usability. I tell businesses the commercial benefits of making their products / services available to all via the internet, and then get paid to do the work needed.
As a potential employer, it's crap. If I take somebody on, I don't want to have to make allowances for a disability. It's not financially viable for a small business to implement special measures. I'm looking at taking on my first employee in February - I could take on a blind person, but how will they chose colour schemes. I could take on a deaf person, but I'm sure clients would get a bit annoyed talking to the textphone voice. I could take on somebody in a wheelchair, but it'll cost a fortune to get ramps / wide doors etc installed. If there's a commercial benefit to me taking somebody on with disablilities, I'll do it, but I'm not going to risk my business by taking somebody on just so I can be politically correct and feel good about myself. For big businesses, it's great - they should 'do their bit', but for small businesses, the law does nothing but stifle growth.