Okay apologies if this s long but i could really do with a bit of help.
Oliver is my middle child, he's 16 months old now.
During the summer he had a bit of peanut butter and a few days later he came up with a rash on his face.
It looked a bit like an ezcema rash, but I just thought it was a flare up or a general rash and although him having peanut butter the day or so earlier i didnt really think it was that.
About a month after that he had some more peanut butter, and this time, within a few hours his whole face had this rash and his face was puffy as well. It stayed like this for about 5 days or so.
So after he flared up again for the 2nd time I took him to the Dr while he still had the rash. The Dr was pretty dismissive. Said that it looked like a flare up of ezcema and gave me some cream for it. Basically said that we should avoid anything to do with peanuts and nuts until he is a lot older.
Okay, so I went away not very happy. I did some research on the net and found that flare up of ezcema can actually be caused by an allergic reaction. For the fact that the 2nd time he was exposed to it he reacted quicker and was a lot worse (neither time did he seem to have any swelling in the throat or breathing problems).
So since then I've kept him away from peanuts. BUT how long can I realistically avoid him potentially coming into contact with peanuts. I feel like I'm in limbo in a way. He might be allergic, or he might not...
If he isn't then great obviously, but if he is, and he comes into contact with it again when were out and about somewhere, and the reaction is a lot worse, of course peanuts allergies can be one of the worst allergies for reaction times and severity.
So when the health visitor came round to weigh Amelia last week I spoke to her about it.
She agrees that it potentially could be a peanut allergy. And she seemed to listen more about my concerns about it than the Dr did.
She tells me that raelly he needs to be exposed to the allergen again to see if he reacts to it again. If he does then it's definate a peanut allergy then we can go down the route that takes us.
As Mark's parents live across from A+E she said we should give him a little bit of peanut butter while we are at their house. Then if he does react we are 2 mins away from getting him seen straight away. IS this really a good idea? She said that if he has any reaction to the peanut then we should take him over to A+E straight away so that they can assess him and treat him if he needs to be.
Do you think its a good idea? isnt it better for him to be allergy tested? the gp didnt seem interested in that. can i do itprivately?
Oliver is my middle child, he's 16 months old now.
During the summer he had a bit of peanut butter and a few days later he came up with a rash on his face.
It looked a bit like an ezcema rash, but I just thought it was a flare up or a general rash and although him having peanut butter the day or so earlier i didnt really think it was that.
About a month after that he had some more peanut butter, and this time, within a few hours his whole face had this rash and his face was puffy as well. It stayed like this for about 5 days or so.
So after he flared up again for the 2nd time I took him to the Dr while he still had the rash. The Dr was pretty dismissive. Said that it looked like a flare up of ezcema and gave me some cream for it. Basically said that we should avoid anything to do with peanuts and nuts until he is a lot older.
Okay, so I went away not very happy. I did some research on the net and found that flare up of ezcema can actually be caused by an allergic reaction. For the fact that the 2nd time he was exposed to it he reacted quicker and was a lot worse (neither time did he seem to have any swelling in the throat or breathing problems).
So since then I've kept him away from peanuts. BUT how long can I realistically avoid him potentially coming into contact with peanuts. I feel like I'm in limbo in a way. He might be allergic, or he might not...
If he isn't then great obviously, but if he is, and he comes into contact with it again when were out and about somewhere, and the reaction is a lot worse, of course peanuts allergies can be one of the worst allergies for reaction times and severity.
So when the health visitor came round to weigh Amelia last week I spoke to her about it.
She agrees that it potentially could be a peanut allergy. And she seemed to listen more about my concerns about it than the Dr did.
She tells me that raelly he needs to be exposed to the allergen again to see if he reacts to it again. If he does then it's definate a peanut allergy then we can go down the route that takes us.
As Mark's parents live across from A+E she said we should give him a little bit of peanut butter while we are at their house. Then if he does react we are 2 mins away from getting him seen straight away. IS this really a good idea? She said that if he has any reaction to the peanut then we should take him over to A+E straight away so that they can assess him and treat him if he needs to be.
Do you think its a good idea? isnt it better for him to be allergy tested? the gp didnt seem interested in that. can i do itprivately?