Bizarre news story!



:shock: Is that for real?! :shock:

I wonder how the baby didn't get hurt when falling... :(

Poor thing! :(

This story sounds almost impossible!
:shock:
 
surely not, what about the umbilical cord attaching baby to mummy? what about the speed or the train. and the baby was 2 months prem.. hmm i'm not sure if i believe it.

if its tru the amazing
 
Sweetcheeks24 said:
surely not, what about the umbilical cord attaching baby to mummy? what about the speed or the train. and the baby was 2 months prem.. hmm i'm not sure if i believe it.

if its tru the amazing

thats exactly what i thought... doesnt ribng true..
 
I thought it was bizzare when i read it this morning too.
 
Maybe the cord snapped with the force and velocity of the train? Amazing story if true.
I used the loo on a train in India once (once was enough!!). It certainly is an experience, you get wind rushing up your bottom :shock: !!
 
Sweetcheeks24 said:
surely not, what about the umbilical cord attaching baby to mummy? what about the speed or the train. and the baby was 2 months prem.. hmm i'm not sure if i believe it.

if its tru the amazing


i was thinking the exact same thing. but then i thought...



Happybunny said:
Maybe the cord snapped with the force and velocity of the train? Amazing story if true.


Now I'm just confused :think: :?
 
I don't really believe it all especially where she says she hadn't even realised for a second that baby had come out how can you not feel it come out even if you'd been lucky enough to not have painful contractions etc also the cord thing and that she was passed out for a few minutes then alerted everyone, then they stopped train and went back for baby, how far on would a train get in that time!!! I would however like a labour like that bar the train and the loo! :rotfl:
 
trixipaws said:
:think: i dont believe that for a minute! :shakehead:

Im with TP on this one! It sounds like it was made up by somebody who knows nothing about having a baby :?
 
Sweetcheeks24 said:
surely not, what about the umbilical cord attaching baby to mummy?

That was my first thought! The cord would have still been attached to the mother! :think: Not sure whether to believe this or not.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,582
Messages
4,654,677
Members
110,059
Latest member
Sianab
Back
Top