Sigh. Does anyone else find his stunts really pointless & annoying?
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20080925/ ... a80c0.html
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20080925/ ... a80c0.html
Vicki83 said:I thought when I read about it at first he was gonna be like that for the full 60 hours, but I saw some footage and he was down 3 times in an hour for breaks - so really it wasn't what he said it was gonna be!
I personally think there's no point to his stunts other than publicity for whatever reason he feels he needs it!
Misslarue said:Vicki83 said:I thought when I read about it at first he was gonna be like that for the full 60 hours, but I saw some footage and he was down 3 times in an hour for breaks - so really it wasn't what he said it was gonna be!
I personally think there's no point to his stunts other than publicity for whatever reason he feels he needs it!
He must make some money from them![]()
He was also allowed to free his leg and raise his torso to a horizontal position. Now thats not hanging upside down!
I have no time for him, theres so much more going on in the world. He's about endurance, whatever!![]()
When he was in the box over the Thames, there was a guy with a sign that read:
'A fool decides to starve himself and we all stand and watch. Millions are starving everyday and no one cares to look'
Something along those lines anyway. He has a point.
SarahH said:Bring back Paul Daniels anyday!!